URC 522 Article 19: “Partial Payments” – Explanation

ARTICLE 19: PARTIAL PAYMENTS

Clause a:

“In respect of clean collections, partial payments may be accepted if and to the extent to which and on the conditions on which partial payments are authorised by the law in force in the place of payment. The financial document(s) will be released to the drawee only when full payment thereof has been received.”

Explanation: This clause allows for partial payments in clean collections, provided that the law in the place where payment is to be made permits such partial payments. Clean collections involve the collection of financial documents without accompanying commercial documents (like invoices or bills of lading). The key point here is that even if a partial payment is made, the financial documents (such as drafts or promissory notes) will only be handed over to the drawee (the party expected to pay) once the full payment is received.

Example: A bank in India is handling a clean collection for a draft of $10,000 drawn on a drawee in the USA. The drawee offers to make a partial payment of $6,000, but under US law, partial payments on such drafts are not permissible. As a result, the bank must refuse the partial payment. If US law did allow partial payments, the bank would still need to hold the financial document until the full $10,000 is paid.

Clause b:

“In respect of documentary collections, partial payments will only be accepted if specifically authorised in the collection instruction. However, unless otherwise instructed, the presenting bank will release the documents to the drawee only after full payment has been received, and the presenting bank will not be responsible for any consequences arising out of any delay in the delivery of documents.”

Explanation: This clause deals with documentary collections, where both financial and commercial documents are presented for payment. Partial payments can only be accepted if the collection instruction (instructions from the seller or remitting bank to the presenting bank) explicitly allows it. Even then, unless the collection instruction states otherwise, the presenting bank should not release the documents to the drawee until full payment has been made. The bank is also not liable for any delays in document delivery that result from this process.

Example: A seller in Germany exports goods to a buyer in Brazil under a documentary collection of $50,000. The collection instruction specifies that partial payments are acceptable. The buyer makes an initial payment of $30,000. However, the presenting bank in Brazil cannot release the shipping documents (e.g., bill of lading, invoice) to the buyer until the remaining $20,000 is paid, unless the collection instruction specifically allows for the documents to be released against partial payment.

Clause c:

“In all cases partial payments will be accepted only subject to compliance with the provisions of either Article 17 or Article 18 as appropriate. Partial payment, if accepted, will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of Article 16.”

Explanation: This clause emphasizes that any partial payment, whether in clean or documentary collections, must comply with the relevant provisions of Article 17 (which deals with clean collections) or Article 18 (which deals with documentary collections). Moreover, any accepted partial payment must be processed according to the rules outlined in Article 16, which addresses issues related to the presentation of documents and payment.

Example: If a partial payment is accepted for a documentary collection under Article 18, it must follow the procedures for handling documents as per Article 16. For instance, if Article 16 requires that the documents be delivered to the drawee against payment, and a partial payment is accepted, the presenting bank must ensure that this requirement is still met. The documents should not be handed over unless the full payment conditions outlined in Article 16 are satisfied.

UCP600 Article 19: Transport Document Covering at Least Two Different Modes of Transport Explanation

UCP600 Article 19: Transport Document Covering at Least Two Different Modes of Transport

Clause (a): Requirements for Transport Document

Clause (a)(i): Indication and Signature

  • Clause: “A transport document covering at least two different modes of transport (multimodal or combined transport document), however named, must appear to: indicate the name of the carrier and be signed by:
    • the carrier or a named agent for or on behalf of the carrier, or
    • the master or a named agent for or on behalf of the master. Any signature by the carrier, master or agent must be identified as that of the carrier, master or agent. Any signature by an agent must indicate whether the agent has signed for or on behalf of the carrier or for or on behalf of the master.”
  • Explanation: The transport document must indicate the name of the carrier and be signed by the carrier, the master, or a named agent on behalf of the carrier or the master. The signature must clearly identify the signer as the carrier, master, or agent and specify on whose behalf the agent is signing.
  • Example:
  • A multimodal transport document shows the carrier as “ABC Shipping Co.” and is signed by “John Doe, Agent for ABC Shipping Co.”
  • A multimodal transport document shows the carrier as “ABC Shipping Co.” and is signed by “ABC Shipping Co.”
  • A multimodal transport document shows the carrier as “XYZ Maritime” and is signed by “Jane Smith, Master of MV Oceanic.”

Clause (a)(ii): Indication of Dispatch, Taking in Charge, or Shipped on Board

  • Clause: “indicate that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or shipped on board at the place stated in the credit, by:
    • pre-printed wording, or
    • a stamp or notation indicating the date on which the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or shipped on board. The date of issuance of the transport document will be deemed to be the date of dispatch, taking in charge or shipped on board, and the date of shipment. However, if the transport document indicates, by stamp or notation, a date of dispatch, taking in charge or shipped on board, this date will be deemed to be the date of shipment.”
  • Explanation: The document must indicate that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge, or shipped on board at the place specified in the credit. This can be shown through pre-printed wording, a stamp, or a notation indicating the date. The date of issuance is considered the date of dispatch unless another date is specified.
  • Example:
  • A multimodal B/L states “Shipped on board MV Horizon on 15th July 2024.” Date of issuance as 08th July 2024. Then 15th July 2024 will be considered as shipment date
  • A multimodal B/L with pre-printed text “Shipped on board” and the date of issuance as 20th July 2024, will have 20th July 2024 as the shipment date unless an on board notation specifies a different date.
  • A multimodal B/L states date is issuance as 08th July 2024 and does not contain any separate onboard notation then issuance date will be considered as shipment date

Clause (a)(iii): Indication of Place of Dispatch and Final Destination

  • Clause: “indicate the place of dispatch, taking in charge or shipment and the place of final destination stated in the credit, even if: a. the transport document states, in addition, a different place of dispatch, taking in charge or shipment or place of final destination, or b. the transport document contains the indication “intended” or similar qualification in relation to the vessel, port of loading or port of discharge.”
  • Explanation: The transport document must show the place of dispatch and the final destination as stated in the credit, even if it mentions other places or uses terms like “intended.”
  • Example: A document shows “Place of Dispatch: Mumbai, Final Destination: New York,” but also mentions “intended final destination: Los Angeles.” This is acceptable as the primary places match the credit terms.

Clause (a)(iv): Sole Original or Full Set

  • Clause: “be the sole original transport document or, if issued in more than one original, be the full set as indicated on the transport document.”
  • Explanation: The document must be the sole original or, if issued in multiple originals, the full set as indicated on the document.
  • Example: If a transport document states “Three originals,” all three must be presented. If only one original exists, it should be the one presented.

Clause (a)(v): Terms and Conditions of Carriage

  • Clause: “contain terms and conditions of carriage or make reference to another source containing the terms and conditions of carriage (short form or blank back transport document). Contents of terms and conditions of carriage will not be examined.”
  • Explanation: The document must include or reference terms and conditions of carriage, but the content of these terms is not subject to examination.
  • Example:
  • A B/L mentions the detailed Terms and Conditions conditions in the back side of documents.
  • A B/L references “Terms and Conditions available at www.abcshipping.com.”

Clause (a)(vi): No Charter Party Indication

  • Clause: “contain no indication that it is subject to a charter party.”
  • Explanation: The document must not indicate that it is subject to a charter party.
  • Example: A document stating “Subject to charter party” is unacceptable. It must not contain such indications. Because there is a separate article available in UCP 600 for checking charter party bill of lading

Clause (b): Definition of Transhipment

  • Clause: “For the purpose of this article, transhipment means unloading from one means of conveyance and reloading to another means of conveyance (whether or not in different modes of transport) during the carriage from the place of dispatch, taking in charge or shipment to the place of final destination stated in the credit.”
  • Explanation: Transhipment refers to unloading from one conveyance and reloading to another during the carriage from the dispatch point to the final destination.
  • Example: Goods are unloaded from a ship at Singapore and reloaded onto a truck to continue to the final destination. This is considered transhipment.

Clause (c)(i): Transhipment Indication

  • Clause: “A transport document may indicate that the goods will or may be transhipped provided that the entire carriage is covered by one and the same transport document.”
  • Explanation: The document may indicate that transhipment will or may occur as long as the entire journey is covered by one transport document.
  • Example: A document states, “Transhipment may occur at Singapore,” but it covers the entire journey from Mumbai to New York under one document. It is acceptable.

Clause (c)(ii): Acceptability Despite Prohibition

  • Clause: “A transport document indicating that transhipment will or may take place is acceptable, even if the credit prohibits transhipment.”
  • Explanation: A transport document indicating possible transhipment is acceptable even if the credit prohibits transhipment.
  • Example: Even if a credit states “No transhipment allowed,” a document indicating “Transhipment may occur” is acceptable as per UCP600 Article 19.