CDCS PREPARATION

UCP600 Article 4 Explanation – CDCS Guide: Credits vs. Contracts Explained

by

Clause a:

Clause:
“A credit by its nature is a separate transaction from the sale or other contract on which it may be based. Banks are in no way concerned with or bound by such contract, even if any reference whatsoever to it is included in the credit. Consequently, the undertaking of a bank to honour, to negotiate or to fulfil any other obligation under the credit is not subject to claims or defences by the applicant resulting from its relationships with the issuing bank or the beneficiary. A beneficiary can in no case avail itself of the contractual relationships existing between banks or between the applicant and the issuing bank.”

Explanation:
This clause emphasizes that a letter of credit (LC) is an independent and autonomous instrument, separate from the underlying contract of sale or any other agreement on which it might be based. The bank’s responsibility is confined to the LC terms alone and does not extend to the performance or enforcement of the underlying contract between the buyer (applicant) and the seller (beneficiary). Even if the LC references the contract, it does not bind the bank to the terms of that contract.

Example:
Suppose Company A (the buyer) in India enters into a contract to purchase goods from Company B (the seller) in Germany. Company A applies for a letter of credit from its bank to guarantee payment to Company B. If Company A later disputes the quality of the goods or any other aspect of the contract, this dispute does not affect the bank’s obligation to honor the letter of credit, provided that Company B presents compliant documents as per the LC. Company B cannot use the dispute between Company A and the issuing bank as a defense to refuse payment under the LC.

Clause b:

Clause:
“An issuing bank should discourage any attempt by the applicant to include, as an integral part of the credit, copies of the underlying contract, proforma invoice and the like.”

Explanation:
This clause advises issuing banks to discourage applicants (buyers) from including references to or copies of underlying contracts, proforma invoices, or similar documents within the letter of credit itself. This is because including such documents can create unnecessary complications and potentially obscure the clear, independent nature of the letter of credit. The focus should remain solely on the terms and conditions stipulated in the LC.

Example:
Company A requests its bank to issue an LC to Company B, and in doing so, Company A wants to include a copy of the contract between the two companies as part of the LC. The bank advises against this, explaining that including the contract might complicate the LC process and affect the independent nature of the LC. Instead, the bank focuses only on the essential documents required by the LC, such as the commercial invoice, bill of lading, and certificate of origin, ensuring the LC remains straightforward and separate from the underlying contract.

UCP600 Article 5 Explanation – CDCS Guide: The Role of Banks in Documentary Credits – Focusing on Documents vs. Goods and Services

by

UCP600 Article 5: Explanation with Examples

Clause: “Documents v. Goods, Services or Performance
Banks deal with documents and not with goods, services or performance to which the documents may relate.”

Explanation: UCP600 Article 5 emphasizes that banks involved in the documentary credit process only examine and act upon the documents presented to them. They do not concern themselves with the actual goods, services, or performance referenced in those documents. The bank’s responsibility is to verify that the documents conform to the terms and conditions of the letter of credit (LC) and are presented in the correct form. The bank does not verify the quality, quantity, or condition of the goods or services mentioned in the documents.

This principle is fundamental to the documentary credit process, where the focus is on documents rather than the underlying transaction. It ensures that the bank’s role is confined to document verification, making the process more objective and straightforward.

Example: Imagine a company in India imports electronics from a supplier in China under a letter of credit. The supplier ships the goods and presents the shipping documents, such as the bill of lading, invoice, and packing list, to the bank for payment.

The bank reviews these documents to ensure they comply with the terms of the letter of credit. However, the bank does not physically inspect the electronics or verify whether they are functioning or in good condition. Even if the goods turn out to be defective, the bank’s obligation is limited to paying against the compliant documents, not the actual goods. If the documents are in order, the bank must make the payment, regardless of any issues with the goods themselves.

UCP600 Article 6 Explanations – CDCS Guide : Availability, Expiry Date, and Place for Presentation

by

UCP600 Article 6: Detailed Explanation with Examples

Clause (a)

Clause:
“A credit must state the bank with which it is available or whether it is available with any bank. A credit available with a nominated bank is also available with the issuing bank.”

Explanation:
This clause requires that the letter of credit (LC) clearly specifies the bank where the credit is available. It could be available with a specific bank (nominated bank) or any bank. If the LC is available with a nominated bank, it also implies that it is available with the issuing bank.

Example:
Suppose an LC issued by ABC Bank in the USA states that it is available with XYZ Bank in the UK. This means that the beneficiary can present the documents to XYZ Bank for payment. However, the beneficiary can also present the documents to ABC Bank directly since the LC is also available with the issuing bank.

Clause (b)

Clause:
“A credit must state whether it is available by sight payment, deferred payment, acceptance, or negotiation.”

Explanation:
The LC must specify the method of payment. It could be one of the following:

  • Sight payment: Immediate payment upon presentation of complying documents.
  • Deferred payment: Payment at a later date, as specified in the LC. In deferred payment terms draft is not presented and instead of draft there will be deferred payment undertaking.
  • Acceptance: The issuing or nominated bank accepts a draft and commits to pay on the maturity date.
  • Negotiation: The nominated bank may purchase the documents (and drafts) and pay immediately, even before the maturity date.

Example:
An LC issued by DEF Bank in Germany specifies that it is available by sight payment. This means that when the beneficiary presents the required documents, the bank must pay them immediately upon verifying that the documents comply with the LC terms.

Clause (c)

Clause:
“A credit must not be issued available by a draft drawn on the applicant.”

Explanation:
The LC cannot require the beneficiary to draw a draft (a bill of exchange) on the applicant (the buyer). This is to ensure that the responsibility for payment lies with the bank and not with the buyer, making the LC a more secure instrument for the beneficiary.

Example:
If GHI Bank in Japan issues an LC for an exporter in India, the LC cannot require the exporter to draw a draft on the buyer in Japan. Instead, the draft must be drawn on the issuing bank (GHI Bank) or a nominated bank.

Clause (d) (i)

Clause:
“A credit must state an expiry date for presentation. An expiry date stated for honour or negotiation will be deemed to be an expiry date for presentation.”

Explanation:
The LC must include a specific expiry date by which the beneficiary must present the documents to the bank. If the expiry date is mentioned for honour (payment) or negotiation, it is considered the expiry date for the presentation of documents as well.

Example:
If an LC issued by JKL Bank in Canada states an expiry date of 31st August 2024 for negotiation, the beneficiary must present the documents by that date to receive payment. This is also considered the last date for presenting the documents, even if not explicitly stated.

Clause (d) (ii)

Clause:
“The place of the bank with which the credit is available is the place for presentation. The place for presentation under a credit available with any bank is that of any bank. A place for presentation other than that of the issuing bank is in addition to the place of the issuing bank.”

Explanation:
This clause clarifies that the place where the credit is available (e.g., a specific bank) is also the place where the documents must be presented. If the credit is available with any bank, documents can be presented at any bank. If the LC allows presentation at a place other than the issuing bank, that place is considered additional, not a replacement.

Example:
An LC issued by MNO Bank in the UAE states that it is available with PQR Bank in Singapore. The place for presentation of documents is PQR Bank in Singapore. However, the documents can also be presented at MNO Bank in the UAE.

Clause (e)

Clause:
“Except as provided in sub-article 29 (a), a presentation by or on behalf of the beneficiary must be made on or before the expiry date.”

Explanation:
The beneficiary or their representative must present the documents by the expiry date mentioned in the LC. If the presentation is made after the expiry date, it may be rejected unless it falls under the exceptions provided in Article 29(a).

Example:
An LC issued by RST Bank in Australia has an expiry date of 15th September 2024. The beneficiary must ensure that the documents are presented to the bank by this date. If the documents are presented on 16th September, they may be rejected.

UCP600 Article 7 Explanation – CDCS Guide: Issuing Bank Undertaking

by

UCP600 Article 7 Explained

Clause (a)

Clause:
“Provided that the stipulated documents are presented to the nominated bank or to the issuing bank and that they constitute a complying presentation, the issuing bank must honour if the credit is available by:
i. sight payment, deferred payment, or acceptance with the issuing bank;
ii. sight payment with a nominated bank and that nominated bank does not pay;
iii. deferred payment with a nominated bank and that nominated bank does not incur its deferred payment undertaking or, having incurred its deferred payment undertaking, does not pay at maturity;
iv. acceptance with a nominated bank and that nominated bank does not accept a draft drawn on it or, having accepted a draft drawn on it, does not pay at maturity;
v. negotiation with a nominated bank and that nominated bank does not negotiate.”

Explanation:
This clause outlines the issuing bank’s obligation to honour a letter of credit when the beneficiary presents complying documents. If the credit is available by various methods (e.g., sight payment, deferred payment, acceptance, or negotiation), the issuing bank must honour the credit under the following circumstances:

  • If the credit is available with the issuing bank itself by sight payment, deferred payment, or acceptance.
  • If the credit is available with a nominated bank but that bank fails to pay, incur a deferred payment undertaking, accept a draft, or negotiate.

In simpler terms, the issuing bank guarantees payment to the beneficiary even if the nominated bank fails to perform its duties under the letter of credit.

Example:
A company in India sells goods to a buyer in the USA under a letter of credit issued by an Indian bank. The Indian bank (issuing bank) allows the credit to be available by negotiation with a U.S. bank (nominated bank). If the U.S. bank fails to negotiate the documents (i.e., doesn’t purchase or discount the draft), the Indian bank must still honour the payment to the beneficiary in India, provided the documents comply with the credit terms.

Clause (b)

Clause:
“An issuing bank is irrevocably bound to honour as of the time it issues the credit.”

Explanation:
Once the issuing bank issues a letter of credit, it is irrevocably bound to honour the credit as long as the beneficiary presents compliant documents. This means that the issuing bank cannot revoke or cancel its obligation once the credit is issued.

Example:
If an issuing bank in Japan issues a letter of credit on behalf of a buyer in Japan for goods purchased from a supplier in China, the bank cannot withdraw its commitment once the letter of credit is issued. As long as the Chinese supplier presents the required documents as per the credit terms, the Japanese bank must honour the payment.

Clause (c)

Clause:
“An issuing bank undertakes to reimburse a nominated bank that has honoured or negotiated a complying presentation and forwarded the documents to the issuing bank. Reimbursement for the amount of a complying presentation under a credit available by acceptance or deferred payment is due at maturity, whether or not the nominated bank prepaid or purchased before maturity. An issuing bank’s undertaking to reimburse a nominated bank is independent of the issuing bank’s undertaking to the beneficiary.”

Explanation:
This clause states that if a nominated bank honours or negotiates a complying presentation and sends the documents to the issuing bank, the issuing bank must reimburse the nominated bank. If the credit is available by acceptance or deferred payment, the issuing bank must pay the nominated bank at maturity, regardless of whether the nominated bank prepaid or purchased the documents before maturity. The issuing bank’s obligation to reimburse the nominated bank is independent of its obligation to pay the beneficiary.

Example:
Suppose a French bank (issuing bank) issues a letter of credit available by deferred payment with a German bank (nominated bank). The German bank honours a complying presentation and forwards the documents to the French bank. The French bank must reimburse the German bank at maturity, even if the German bank had advanced payment to the beneficiary before the maturity date. This reimbursement obligation is separate from the French bank’s obligation to the beneficiary under the credit.

UCP600 Article 8 Explanation – CDCS Guide: Confirming Bank Undertaking

by

Article 8: Confirming Bank Undertaking

Clause a

Clause:
Provided that the stipulated documents are presented to the confirming bank or to any other nominated bank and that they constitute a complying presentation, the confirming bank must:

i. honour, if the credit is available by –

a. sight payment, deferred payment or acceptance with the confirming bank;

b. sight payment with another nominated bank and that nominated bank does not pay;

c. deferred payment with another nominated bank and that nominated bank does not incur its deferred payment undertaking or, having incurred its deferred payment undertaking, does not pay at maturity; d. acceptance with another nominated bank and that nominated bank does not accept a draft drawn on it or, having accepted a draft drawn on it, does not pay at maturity;

e. negotiation with another nominated bank and that nominated bank does not negotiate.

ii. negotiate, without recourse, if the credit is available by negotiation with the confirming bank.

Explanation:
This clause outlines the conditions under which the confirming bank must honor or negotiate the credit. If the stipulated documents are presented and they comply with the terms of the credit, the confirming bank has specific obligations to fulfill. Honour means fulfilling the obligations i.e. issuing acceptance or doing payment as per applicable scenario.

Examples:

  1. Sight payment with the confirming bank: The confirming bank in India must pay the exporter immediately upon presentation of compliant documents if the credit specifies sight payment.
  2. Sight payment with another nominated bank: If the UK bank (another nominated bank) fails to pay under a sight payment arrangement, the confirming bank in India must still pay the exporter.
  3. Deferred payment with another nominated bank: If the UK bank fails to honor a deferred payment at maturity, the confirming bank in India must pay the exporter.
  4. Acceptance with another nominated bank: If the UK bank fails to accept a draft or pay it at maturity, the confirming bank in India must step in and honour.
  5. Negotiation with another nominated bank: If the UK bank fails to negotiate the documents and pay to exporter, the confirming bank in India must honour the documents.
  6. Negotiate, without recourse, if the credit is available by negotiation with the confirming bank: The confirming bank in India must negotiate the documents without recourse if the credit is available by negotiation with confirming bank. (“Without recourse” here means incase issuing bank defaults to reimburse confirming bank then confirming bank would not be able to claim the funds back from beneficiary)

Clause b

Clause:
A confirming bank is irrevocably bound to honour or negotiate as of the time it adds its confirmation to the credit.

Explanation:
Once a confirming bank adds its confirmation to a letter of credit, it is irrevocably obligated to honor or negotiate the credit. This clause provides certainty and assurance to the beneficiary of the letter of credit.

Example:
When the confirming bank in India adds its confirmation to a letter of credit, it is legally bound to pay or negotiate according to the terms of the credit, giving the exporter confidence in receiving payment.

Clause c

Clause:

Confirming bank undertakes to reimburse another nominated bank that has honoured or negotiated a
complying presentation and forwarded the documents to the confirming bank. Reimbursement for the
amount of a complying presentation under a credit available by acceptance or deferred payment is due at
maturity, whether or not another nominated bank prepaid or purchased before maturity. A confirming
bank’s undertaking to reimburse another nominated bank is independent of the confirming bank’s
undertaking to the beneficiary.

Explanation:
The confirming bank must reimburse another nominated bank that honors or negotiates a complying presentation. The reimbursement is due at maturity for credits available by acceptance or deferred payment, regardless of whether the nominated bank prepaid or purchased before maturity. This reimbursement obligation is independent of the confirming bank’s undertaking to the beneficiary.

Example:
If another bank in the UK honors a deferred payment and forwards the documents to the confirming bank in India, the confirming bank must reimburse the UK bank at maturity. It is additional obligation of confirming bank apart from the obligations we read in previous clauses which were obligations towards beneficiary.

Clause d

Clause:

If a bank is authorized or requested by the issuing bank to confirm a credit but is not prepared to do so,
it must inform the issuing bank without delay and may advise the credit without confirmation.


Explanation:
If a bank is asked to confirm a credit but is unwilling, it must promptly inform the issuing bank and may still advise the credit without confirmation. This ensures clarity and timely communication between banks.

Example:
If the confirming bank in India is requested to confirm a credit but chooses not to, it must inform the issuing bank in the UK immediately and can advise the credit without adding its confirmation.

UCP600 Article 9 Explanation – CDCS Guide: Advising of Credits and Amendments

by

Clause a

Clause: A credit and any amendment may be advised to a beneficiary through an advising bank. An advising bank that is not a confirming bank advises the credit and any amendment without any undertaking to honour or negotiate.

Explanation: An advising bank acts as an intermediary that passes the credit and any amendments to the beneficiary. If the advising bank is not a confirming bank, it does not provide any guarantee or obligation to honor or negotiate the credit; it simply forwards the information received from the issuing bank to the beneficiary.

Example: Bank A (the issuing bank) issues a letter of credit for $100,000 to Beneficiary X. This credit is sent through Bank B (the advising bank). Bank B, which is not confirming the credit, forwards this letter of credit to Beneficiary X without any promise to pay the $100,000 itself.

Clause b

Clause: By advising the credit or amendment, the advising bank signifies that it has satisfied itself as to the apparent authenticity of the credit or amendment and that the advice accurately reflects the terms and conditions of the credit or amendment received.

Explanation: When the advising bank forwards the credit or amendment to the beneficiary, it indicates that it has verified the apparent authenticity of the document and confirms that the details provided to the beneficiary match those received from the issuing bank. However, advising bank does not verify genuineness of the LC. “Apparent authenticity” means that the letter of credit should appear to look authentic from the face. If LC is transmitted through swift then authenticity automatically verified by checking if it is received in MT700 format and in swift application as this application is secured.

Example: Bank B receives an amendment to the letter of credit from Bank A. Before advising Beneficiary X, Bank B checks the authenticity of the amendment and ensures that the details match those sent by Bank A. Once verified, Bank B advises Beneficiary X of the amendment.

Clause c

Clause: An advising bank may utilize the services of another bank (“second advising bank”) to advise the credit and any amendment to the beneficiary. By advising the credit or amendment, the second advising bank signifies that it has satisfied itself as to the apparent authenticity of the advice it has received and that the advice accurately reflects the terms and conditions of the credit or amendment received.

Explanation: An advising bank can use a second advising bank to forward the credit or amendment to the beneficiary. The second advising bank must also verify the authenticity of the document it received and ensure the details are accurate before advising the beneficiary.

Example: Bank A issues a credit and sends it to Bank B, which then uses Bank C (second advising bank) to advise Beneficiary X. Bank C verifies the authenticity of the document received from Bank B and advises Beneficiary X.

Clause d

Clause: A bank utilizing the services of an advising bank or second advising bank to advise a credit must use the same bank to advise any amendment thereto.

Explanation: If an issuing bank uses an advising bank or a second advising bank to advise a credit, it must use the same advising bank for any subsequent amendments to that credit to ensure consistency and reliability in communication.

Example: Bank A issues a credit through Bank B to Beneficiary X. Later, if there is an amendment, Bank A must again use Bank B to advise Beneficiary X of this amendment.

Clause e

Clause: If a bank is requested to advise a credit or amendment but elects not to do so, it must so inform, without delay, the bank from which the credit, amendment or advice has been received.

Explanation: If a bank chooses not to advise a credit or amendment, it must promptly notify the bank that sent the credit or amendment of its decision not to advise it. This ensures transparency and allows the issuing bank to take necessary actions. Please note here the word “immediately” is not defined anywhere about how long it means. So we need to consider this as soon as possible.

Example: Bank B receives a credit from Bank A but decides not to advise it to Beneficiary X. Bank B promptly informs Bank A of its decision not to advise the credit.

Clause f

Clause: If a bank is requested to advise a credit or amendment but cannot satisfy itself as to the apparent authenticity of the credit, the amendment or the advice, it must so inform, without delay, the bank from which the instructions appear to have been received. If the advising bank or second advising bank elects nonetheless to advise the credit or amendment, it must inform the beneficiary or second advising bank that it has not been able to satisfy itself as to the apparent authenticity of the credit, the amendment or the advice.

Explanation: If an advising bank cannot verify the authenticity of the credit or amendment, it must inform the bank that sent it. If the advising bank still decides to advise the credit or amendment, it must notify the beneficiary or second advising bank that it could not confirm the authenticity.

Example: Bank B receives a credit from Bank A but is unsure of its authenticity. Bank B informs Bank A of this uncertainty. If Bank B decides to advise the credit despite this, it must inform Beneficiary X that it could not verify the credit’s authenticity.