drawee

URC 522 Article 18: “Payment in Foreign Currency” – Detailed Explanation

by

ARTICLE 18 PAYMENT IN FOREIGN CURRENCY

Clause: “In the case of documents payable in a currency other than that of the country of payment (foreign currency), the presenting bank must, unless otherwise instructed in the collection instruction, release the documents to the drawee against payment in the designated foreign currency only if such foreign currency can immediately be remitted in accordance with the instructions given in the collection instruction.”

Explanation: This clause outlines the procedure for handling documents under a collection instruction when the payment is to be made in a foreign currency. The presenting bank, which is the bank handling the documents on behalf of the exporter or seller, is responsible for ensuring that the documents are only released to the drawee (the buyer or importer) if the payment is made in the foreign currency specified in the collection instruction. The key point here is that the foreign currency must be available for immediate remittance according to the instructions given in the collection order. If the collection instruction specifies a payment in a foreign currency, the bank cannot release the documents to the drawee for payment in local currency unless explicitly instructed otherwise.

Example: Let’s consider an example where an exporter in Germany sells goods to an importer in India. The sales contract states that the payment will be made in US dollars (USD). The exporter sends the shipping documents to their bank in Germany, which in turn sends them to the presenting bank in India with a collection instruction stating that the payment must be made in USD.

When the Indian importer (drawee) approaches the presenting bank in India to obtain the shipping documents, the bank must ensure that the payment is made in USD as per the collection instruction. The bank will only release the documents to the importer once the USD payment is confirmed and can be immediately remitted according to the instructions provided by the exporter’s bank.

If the importer attempts to pay in Indian Rupees (INR) instead of USD, the presenting bank must refuse to release the documents unless the collection instruction specifically allows for payment in INR. This ensures that the exporter receives the payment in the agreed foreign currency, protecting their financial interests in the transaction.

This explanation and example should help clarify how Article 18 of URC 522 operates in practice, ensuring that the payment terms in a foreign currency are strictly adhered to, unless otherwise specified in the collection instruction.

URC 522 Article 17: “Payment in Local Currency” Explained

by

ARTICLE 17 PAYMENT IN LOCAL CURRENCY

Clause 1: “In the case of documents payable in the currency of the country of payment (local currency), the presenting bank must, unless otherwise instructed in the collection instruction, release the documents to the drawee against payment in local currency only if such currency is immediately available for disposal in the manner specified in the collection instruction.”

Explanation:

This clause mandates that when a collection involves payment in the local currency of the country where the payment is to be made, the presenting bank has a specific responsibility. The bank must ensure that the documents are only handed over to the drawee (the party responsible for making the payment) upon receiving the local currency payment. The crucial point here is that the currency must be “immediately available for disposal” according to the instructions given in the collection order. This means that the funds should be instantly usable in the manner specified by the remitting bank (the bank that initiated the collection process). If the payment is not immediately available in the required manner, the presenting bank should not release the documents unless explicitly instructed otherwise.

Example:

Imagine a situation where an exporter in the United States ships goods to a buyer in India under a documentary collection. The collection instruction from the U.S. bank specifies that payment must be made in Indian Rupees (INR). When the Indian bank (presenting bank) receives the documents, they are instructed to release these documents to the buyer only upon receiving payment in INR. However, the buyer offers to pay in a foreign currency, such as U.S. dollars, instead of INR.

In this scenario, unless the collection instruction specifically allows for payment in a currency other than INR, the presenting bank should refuse to release the documents. The bank must ensure that the payment in INR is immediately available and can be used as per the remitting bank’s instructions before handing over the documents to the buyer. If the buyer insists on paying in U.S. dollars, the presenting bank would need to seek clarification or further instructions from the remitting bank.

By breaking down this article into its key components and providing practical examples, the intention behind URC 522 Article 17 becomes clear. It ensures that local currency payments are handled in a manner that aligns with the instructions provided, thereby protecting the interests of all parties involved in the transaction.

URC 522 Article 5: Presentation – Explanation

by

Explanation of URC 522 Article 5: Presentation

“a For the purposes of these Articles, presentation is the procedure whereby the presenting bank makes the documents available to the drawee as instructed.”

Explanation:
This clause defines the term “presentation” within the context of URC 522. It specifies that presentation refers to the action of the presenting bank, which is responsible for making the documents available to the drawee (usually the buyer or importer) in accordance with the instructions provided by the remitting bank (usually the seller or exporter’s bank).

Example:
An exporter in India ships goods to an importer in the UK. The exporter’s bank in India sends the shipping documents to a presenting bank in the UK. The presenting bank’s role is to make these documents available to the importer, as per the instructions provided by the exporter’s bank. The importer then reviews these documents and takes the necessary action, such as making payment or accepting a bill of exchange.

“b The collection instruction should state the exact period of time within which any action is to be taken by the drawee. Expressions such as ‘first’, ‘prompt’, ‘immediate’, and the like should not be used in connection with presentation or with reference to any period of time within which documents have to be taken up or for any other action that is to be taken by the drawee. If such terms are used banks will disregard them.”

Explanation:
This clause emphasizes the importance of clear and precise instructions regarding the timeline for the drawee to take action, such as paying or accepting the documents. Vague terms like “prompt” or “immediate” should be avoided because they lack a specific time frame, leading to potential confusion. Banks are instructed to disregard such vague terms if they are used.

Example:
Suppose the collection instruction says, “The drawee should take up the documents promptly upon presentation.” This is considered vague. Instead, the instruction should specify, “The drawee must take up the documents within five business days of presentation.” If the vague term “promptly” is used, the presenting bank will ignore it and proceed based on standard practices or seek clarification.

“c Documents are to be presented to the drawee in the form in which they are received, except that banks are authorised to affix any necessary stamps, at the expense of the party from whom they received the collection unless otherwise instructed, and to make any necessary endorsements or place any rubber stamps or other identifying marks or symbols customary to or required for the collection operation.”

Explanation:
This clause states that the presenting bank must deliver the documents to the drawee in the same condition as they were received, with the exception that the bank may affix stamps or make endorsements as needed for the collection process. These actions are typically carried out at the expense of the party from whom the bank received the documents, unless otherwise instructed.

Example:
An exporter sends shipping documents to a bank for presentation to the importer. The presenting bank notices that a necessary endorsement or stamp is missing. The bank can add the stamp or endorsement and charge the exporter (who sent the documents) for this service unless the exporter has specifically instructed the bank not to do so.

“d For the purpose of giving effect to the instructions of the principal, the remitting bank will utilise the bank nominated by the principal as the collecting bank. In the absence of such nomination, the remitting bank will utilise any bank of its own, or another bank’s choice in the country of payment or acceptance or in the country where other terms and conditions have to be complied with.”

Explanation:
This clause indicates that the remitting bank should use the collecting bank nominated by the principal (usually the seller or exporter) to carry out the collection. If no specific collecting bank is nominated, the remitting bank has the discretion to select a bank either from its own network or any other bank in the relevant country where payment or acceptance is required.

Example:
An exporter in Brazil instructs their bank to use XYZ Bank in Germany as the collecting bank for a transaction with a German buyer. If XYZ Bank is not nominated, the Brazilian bank might choose another German bank with which it has a correspondent relationship to handle the collection.

“e The documents and collection instruction may be sent directly by the remitting bank to the collecting bank or through another bank as intermediary.”

Explanation:
This clause allows flexibility in how documents and instructions are sent by the remitting bank. The remitting bank can send the documents directly to the collecting bank or choose to route them through an intermediary bank. This often depends on the relationships and agreements between the banks involved.

Example:
A bank in China sends documents for collection directly to a bank in Japan. Alternatively, the Chinese bank could send the documents via an intermediary bank in Hong Kong if it believes this route is more reliable or efficient.

“f If the remitting bank does not nominate a specific presenting bank, the collecting bank may utilise a presenting bank of its choice.”

Explanation:
If the remitting bank does not specifically nominate a presenting bank (the bank that will present the documents to the drawee), the collecting bank has the authority to choose a presenting bank on its own. This is usually done based on the collecting bank’s established practices or relationships.

Example:
An exporter’s bank in the US sends documents to a collecting bank in France but does not specify which French bank should present the documents to the importer. The French collecting bank might then choose one of its correspondent banks in the same region to present the documents to the importer.

URC 522 Article 3 : Parties To A Collection – Explanation

by

Explanation of URC 522 Article 3

“ARTICLE 3 PARTIES TO A COLLECTION”

URC 522 Article 3 outlines the key parties involved in a documentary collection process under the Uniform Rules for Collections. This article is crucial as it defines the roles and responsibilities of each party involved, ensuring clarity and efficiency in the collection process.

Clause (a): “For the purposes of these Articles the ‘parties thereto’ are:”

Explanation:
This clause introduces the term “parties thereto,” referring to the main participants in the collection process. These participants include the principal, the remitting bank, the collecting bank, and the presenting bank. Each of these parties plays a distinct role in ensuring that the collection process is carried out smoothly and in accordance with the instructions provided.

Example:
Consider a scenario where an exporter in India sells goods to an importer in Germany. The exporter is the principal who initiates the collection process, and the various banks involved in handling the documents would be considered the remitting, collecting, and presenting banks.

Clause (a)(1): “the ‘principal’ who is the party entrusting the handling of a collection to a bank;”

Explanation:
The “principal” refers to the individual or entity, usually the exporter or seller, who instructs a bank (the remitting bank) to handle the collection process. The principal is responsible for providing the necessary documents and instructions to the bank for the collection to be processed.

Example:
In our earlier scenario, the exporter in India would be the principal who provides the shipping documents and collection instructions to their bank to initiate the process.

Clause (a)(2): “the ‘remitting bank’ which is the bank to which the principal has entrusted the handling of a collection;”

Explanation:
The “remitting bank” is the bank that the principal entrusts with the responsibility of handling the collection. This bank acts on behalf of the principal to send the documents to the collecting bank in the importer’s country and to ensure that the terms of the collection are met.

Example:
The exporter’s bank in India would be the remitting bank, which forwards the collection documents to a bank in Germany for further processing.

Clause (a)(3): “the ‘collecting bank’ which is any bank, other than the remitting bank, involved in processing the collection;”

Explanation:
The “collecting bank” refers to any bank, other than the remitting bank, that is involved in processing the collection. This bank typically receives the documents from the remitting bank and then works to ensure that payment or acceptance is obtained from the drawee (the importer).

Example:
In the scenario, a bank in Germany that receives the collection documents from the remitting bank in India and processes them according to the instructions would be the collecting bank.

Clause (a)(4): “the ‘presenting bank’ which is the collecting bank making presentation to the drawee.”

Explanation:
The “presenting bank” is a specific type of collecting bank that presents the documents to the drawee for payment or acceptance. The presenting bank’s role is crucial in ensuring that the drawee (importer) complies with the terms outlined in the collection instruction.

Example:
If the collecting bank in Germany directly presents the documents to the importer for payment or acceptance, it is acting as the presenting bank.

Clause (b): “The ‘drawee’ is the one to whom presentation is to be made in accordance with the collection instruction.”

Explanation:
The “drawee” is the party, usually the importer or buyer, to whom the documents are presented by the presenting bank. The drawee is expected to either make payment or accept the draft as per the collection instruction provided by the principal.

Example:
In our scenario, the importer in Germany would be the drawee who receives the documents from the presenting bank and is required to make payment or accept the draft according to the terms specified by the exporter.